I'm not sure of what you want to say with your post, Oliver, did you mean that we should PM moderators? I don't understand what you say about "give links that ONLY work until a mod (for the forum) or pryda (for the dump) remove the objectable content"... Didn't the links I posted work? should have not posted them because that is suppose to give them publicity? The, where do I have to report them?
When you say "If you want to prove that a picture is really off-limits, then the best is to copy the picture's URL (in ifap, if you have firefox just right click and ask to copy the picture's adress, in IE I guess you could drag and drop the picture into the adress bar and copy the URL in the adress bar), that way there is no way for someone seeing that precise pictures to return to the gallery where it comes from, nor to know the uploader's name.", I am not sure of what do you mean... i mean, I posted the pictures' URLs, what's wrong then?
Maybe you mean that the links posted in the forum shouldn't be "active"? But i don't think that's possible, cos it is something automatic...
Sorry for this questions, I know it is just something about my bad English, but i promise you i don't know what you wanted to say, because I assume you wanted to tell me I made something wrong, but I couln't understand what was it about.
By the way, this other guy goes on dumping galleries with thumbs linking to landing pages of galleries and not directly to pics:
http://www.gallery-dump.com/index.php?gid=171324
! - Report posts on the gallery-dump.com here - Oliver - !
No prob, mrmister, I'll explain more clearly ^^
I mean : if you can, give links to some pages that will be removed when pryda removes them. This way, soon, your example links won't work anymore, and if someone clicks them, it won't bring traffic to the litigious work of the person you reported.
That means : give links to the gallery-dump pages, OK.
But don't give links to imagefap contents, Pryda can't remove it, and anyone clicking it will have a chance to discover the totality of the uploads by the person you reported - because imagefap always gives a "view full gallery link", and a "Profile" link.
If you really want to give precise picture examples, you can give the real link to the picture, and not the page that contains the picture.
For instance, is a link to a page containing a picture (and there are the Gallery and Profile links). On the contrary, is the link containing the picture, and only the picture, without a "view complete gallery" or "profile" link.
To have the real link to a picture, in Firefox you right-click the picture and one of the options is to copy the adress of the picture. In Internet Explorer, you can drag and drop the picture into the adress bar.
I mean : if you can, give links to some pages that will be removed when pryda removes them. This way, soon, your example links won't work anymore, and if someone clicks them, it won't bring traffic to the litigious work of the person you reported.
That means : give links to the gallery-dump pages, OK.
But don't give links to imagefap contents, Pryda can't remove it, and anyone clicking it will have a chance to discover the totality of the uploads by the person you reported - because imagefap always gives a "view full gallery link", and a "Profile" link.
If you really want to give precise picture examples, you can give the real link to the picture, and not the page that contains the picture.
For instance, is a link to a page containing a picture (and there are the Gallery and Profile links). On the contrary, is the link containing the picture, and only the picture, without a "view complete gallery" or "profile" link.
To have the real link to a picture, in Firefox you right-click the picture and one of the options is to copy the adress of the picture. In Internet Explorer, you can drag and drop the picture into the adress bar.
Merci for the explanation Oliver. It makes sense, I should have thought about that. Now I have edited every link to show directly the pics. If anyone has a look at them, believe me, will want to clean their eyes... I hope this situation gets fixed asap, I'm sure Pryda doesn't want this kind of material in his site.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests